What They’re Hiding: Victim Rights, Narrative Control, and Government Secrets

From victim protections to fact-checking chaos and government cover-ups, here’s what you need to know.

Jan 08, 2025

Good morning, patriots.

When the House passes a bipartisan bill to protect crime victims, you’d think that would be something both sides of the aisle could celebrate. But with 159 Democrats voting no on the Laken Riley Act, the cracks in Washington’s priorities are more visible than ever.

Meanwhile, Mark Zuckerberg is ditching Facebook’s fact-checkers and moving toward crowdsourced content moderation. But does that mean they’re really giving control back to the people—or are they just shifting the blame?

And don’t forget the FBI, which is still hiding critical details about Russiagate, years after the investigation unraveled. What else are they keeping from us?

This issue dives into victim protections, tech giants losing control, and government agencies clinging to their secrets. The question isn’t what they’re hiding—it’s why.

Let’s get into it.

House Passes Laken Riley Act with Bipartisan Support—but 159 Democrats Say No. Why?

The House of Representatives has passed the Laken Riley Act with a 264-159 vote, marking a rare moment of bipartisan cooperation on immigration policy. But despite 48 Democrats breaking ranks to vote in favor of the bill, 159 Democrats opposed it. That’s where the real story begins.

Let’s get into what this bill actually does—and why some lawmakers don’t want it to happen.

What Is the Laken Riley Act?

The bill is named after Laken Riley, a 22-year-old nursing student from Georgia who was tragically murdered by an undocumented immigrant. The case sparked national outrage, becoming a rallying cry for stronger immigration enforcement. The legislation requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain undocumented immigrants charged with theft-related crimes, expanding current detention policies.

For most Americans, that sounds like common sense: If you’re here illegally and you’re charged with a crime, you should be detained. Period. So why did more than 150 Democrats vote against it?

Why Did 159 Democrats Oppose It?

While the bill had solid bipartisan support—including votes from nearly 50 House Democrats—159 members of the party decided to oppose it. Their reasoning? Critics argue the bill’s detention policies are too broad and could result in unintended consequences, such as detaining individuals for minor offenses or extending detention periods beyond what’s necessary.

But let’s be real—most of that pushback comes from progressives who don’t want any expansion of immigration enforcement. The idea of tightening detention policies runs counter to their broader agenda of reducing deportations and curbing law enforcement authority over undocumented individuals.

The vote also exposes a divide within the Democratic Party. The fact that nearly 50 Democrats backed the bill signals that border security isn’t just a Republican issue anymore. Yet the majority of House Democrats still cling to policies that prioritize “immigration reform” over public safety concerns.

What Happens Next?

The bill now heads to the Senate, where things get trickier. Republicans will need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, meaning they’ll have to secure additional Democratic support. The bipartisan momentum from the House might help, but let’s not forget how quickly political theater can take over once bills hit the Senate floor.

The real question is whether Senate Democrats will see this as an opportunity to address public safety concerns tied to illegal immigration—or if they’ll double down on protecting the progressive wing’s open-border policies.

The Laken Riley Act isn’t radical. It’s a common-sense approach to detaining undocumented individuals who are charged with crimes. Yet 159 Democrats opposed it. Why? Because they’re more worried about optics than outcomes.

As the Senate prepares to take up the bill, the divide in Washington couldn’t be clearer. One side says public safety comes first. The other side is still debating it.

Stay tuned—this fight is far from over.

Meta Boss Zuckerberg Says Facebook Will End Third-Party Fact-Checking, Adopt Elon Musk’s ‘Community Notes’

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook will discontinue its third-party fact-checking program, replacing it with Elon Musk’s Community Notes system currently used on X (formerly Twitter).

The decision represents a significant shift in how Facebook handles content moderation and misinformation. Community Notes allows users to crowdsource fact-checking by providing context to misleading posts, a move Musk has championed as a more transparent and democratic approach.

Critics argue that this change could open the door to more misinformation, while supporters say it makes fact-checking less partisan. The new system is expected to roll out globally by mid-2025. Source

Trump Muses Over Renaming Gulf of Mexico ‘Gulf of America’

During a rally in Florida, President-elect Donald Trump floated the idea of renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the ‘Gulf of America’, a suggestion that drew cheers from his supporters and sparked debate online.

Trump framed the proposal as a way to reaffirm American sovereignty and distance the U.S. from Mexico. While the suggestion hasn’t been formalized into policy, it’s seen as another example of Trump’s nationalist rhetoric as he prepares for his second term.

Critics dismissed the remark as populist grandstanding, but supporters say it highlights Trump’s commitment to American pride and dominance. Whether this idea gains traction remains to be seen. Source

FBI Is Still Hiding Details of Russiagate, Newly Released Document Shows

A newly released document reveals that the FBI is still concealing critical details related to the controversial Russiagate investigation, raising fresh concerns about government transparency.

The document, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, indicates that key communications and evidence remain classified, despite repeated calls from lawmakers to make the information public. Critics accuse the FBI of protecting itself from scrutiny over its handling of the investigation.

The revelation has reignited calls for a full investigation into the FBI’s actions during Russiagate, with some lawmakers arguing the bureau is intentionally hiding the truth. Source

1. Majority Believe Biden’s Presidency Won’t Be Remembered Favorably

A recent poll reveals that most Americans believe Biden’s presidency will be remembered unfavorably, with only 35% expressing a positive outlook on his legacy. The numbers reflect growing dissatisfaction with his handling of the economy and national security. Full details here

2. Georgia GOP Expels Never-Trump Former Lieutenant Governor

The Georgia Republican Party has expelled former Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan over his disloyalty to the party and opposition to Donald Trump. The expulsion reflects ongoing divisions within the GOP and the party’s alignment with Trump’s leadership. See more

3. ‘Sad to See’: Trump Team Slams Dems for Playing Politics with National Security Posts

Trump’s team criticized Democrats for delaying the confirmation of key national security posts, accusing them of playing politics with national security. The delays come as Trump prepares to take office, raising concerns about potential security risks during the transition. Read more

4. Blue-State Governor Reverses Course on Trump’s Deportation Efforts

A Democratic governor who previously vowed to fight Trump’s deportation policies is now calling for Trump to fix the border crisis. The reversal highlights growing concerns about immigration issues as states struggle to handle the influx of migrants. More details

5. Two Death Row Inmates Refuse Biden’s Commutation Offer

Two federal death row inmates have refused to accept President Biden’s commutation, choosing instead to remain on death row. The move is seen as a symbolic rejection of Biden’s anti-death penalty stance, sparking debate over capital punishment. Learn more

What if FEMA’s Real Mission Isn’t What You Think?

For decades, we’ve been told that FEMA exists to help people in times of disaster. They’re the ones who show up with food, water, and temporary housing when hurricanes strike or wildfires rage.

That’s what we’ve been told.

But what if that’s not their real purpose?

Most people don’t know that FEMA holds broad, extraordinary powers. Powers that allow the agency to seize private property, restrict movement, and even detain citizens without trial.

And here’s the kicker: They don’t need a natural disaster to do it.

Since its creation, FEMA’s role has quietly expanded under executive orders and national security policies. What started as a disaster relief agency now operates in a space of “national emergency preparedness”—a term that gives them sweeping authority with minimal oversight.

Government insiders have raised concerns about “temporary housing structures” being built across the country. Are they really shelters for displaced hurricane victims—or could they be repurposed for detention camps during civil unrest?

It’s a question we should all be asking.

FEMA’s true powers have rarely been used. But if the wrong crisis hits—and the wrong people are in charge—those powers could be activated at any time.

The next national emergency might not just be about hurricanes and wildfires.

It could be something much bigger.

And FEMA is already prepared.

This Sunday in The Fed-Up Files, we’re digging into what FEMA doesn’t want you to know.

If you’ve ever wondered what happens when “for your safety” becomes “for their control”, it’s time to find out.

👉 Subscribe now and make sure you get the full story.

1. A horrifying viral video shows a man body-slamming a woman headfirst on the road after a fender bender and he was released on $2,500 bail.

2. RFK Jr. is set to meet with several high-profile Democrats, including Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, sparking speculation about his political strategy.

3. An appeals court is reviewing Trump’s upcoming sentencing, creating a unique political situation where a president-elect faces legal consequences post-election.

4. Lara Trump warns that the U.S. must address growing threats in the Middle East, describing the region as a hornet’s nest of terrorism.

5. Some hospitals are quietly bringing back mask mandates due to rising infections and pressure from healthcare unions and officials.