Brilliant breakdown of the procedural trap that actually matters here. The Court's critique of the lower court'sfailure to apply the presumption of good faith isn't just legal boilerplate, it's a signal that mid-decade redistricting challenges need to clear a much higher bar than most people realize. What's intresting is how this ruling essentially creates a time-lock mechanism where tight election deadlines become their own defense against legal challenges. The real story isn't just Texas winning, it's that SCOTUS just wrote a playbook for other states to follow.
Obese people need to buy two seats on a plane. I once flew from Guam to California and the woman in the seat next to me was so large they had to use multiple seat belt extensions to strap her in. She over flowed into my space to the extent that I had to turn my head sideways to breathe. Once the seat belt sign was turned off I went to the back of the plane and stood for the entire flight. Do you think that's fair?
Brilliant breakdown of the procedural trap that actually matters here. The Court's critique of the lower court'sfailure to apply the presumption of good faith isn't just legal boilerplate, it's a signal that mid-decade redistricting challenges need to clear a much higher bar than most people realize. What's intresting is how this ruling essentially creates a time-lock mechanism where tight election deadlines become their own defense against legal challenges. The real story isn't just Texas winning, it's that SCOTUS just wrote a playbook for other states to follow.
Ewh
Obese people need to buy two seats on a plane. I once flew from Guam to California and the woman in the seat next to me was so large they had to use multiple seat belt extensions to strap her in. She over flowed into my space to the extent that I had to turn my head sideways to breathe. Once the seat belt sign was turned off I went to the back of the plane and stood for the entire flight. Do you think that's fair?