Power Grabs and Political Games: The Reckoning Continues

Energy Wars, Transition Sabotage, and FEMA’s Hidden Agenda

Jan 07, 2025

Good morning, patriots.

The power grabs keep coming, the political games are escalating, and the cracks in the Washington establishment are growing deeper. This isn’t business as usual—this is the start of a reckoning that will reshape America’s future.

From Biden’s last-minute drilling bans and transition roadblocks to Trump’s fight against Iran’s nuclear ambitions, this issue dives into the policy moves and hidden agendas that are driving today’s biggest political battles. And just when you think you’ve heard it all, we take a closer look at FEMA’s real mission—a story that raises more questions than answers.

There’s a lot to cover. Let’s dive in.

Biden’s Latest Guantanamo Transfer: A Dangerous Gamble?

It’s official: the Biden administration has quietly shipped 11 Yemeni detainees from Guantanamo Bay to Oman. This latest move brings the facility’s population down to just 15 detainees and inches Biden closer to fulfilling his long-standing goal of shutting it down entirely. But the question no one in the administration seems to want to answer is: What’s the real cost of this “progress”?

The detainees sent to Oman weren’t just low-level suspects picked up on a whim. They were part of the post-9/11 roundup of individuals linked to terrorism—held for two decades without formal charges because of the threat they were believed to pose. And yet, instead of dealing with them through the proper channels, Biden chose to cut a deal with Oman to take them off America’s hands.

Why Oman? Because sending them back to Yemen was deemed too dangerous. Think about that for a second. If they’re too dangerous to return to their own country, why is the Biden administration comfortable releasing them anywhere?

This isn’t just about transferring detainees. It’s about quietly dismantling America’s counterterrorism infrastructure and rolling the dice on national security. The transfer, originally planned for late 2023, was delayed after Hamas attacked Israel, making it politically risky to release detainees at that time. But now, with an election year looming, Biden seems eager to cross Guantanamo off his to-do list—no matter the consequences.

Here’s the reality: Guantanamo isn’t just a detention center. It’s a symbol of America’s post-9/11 commitment to fighting terrorism.Love it or hate it, shutting it down doesn’t make the threats disappear. And every time detainees are released, the risk grows that one of them will show up on a battlefield—or worse, on American soil.

The administration claims security measures are in place, but history tells a different story. Many former detainees have returned to terrorism. And with national security threats on the rise, the timing of this move couldn’t be worse.

The question remains: Is this about justice, or is it about politics? For Biden, it seems clear. He’s more focused on headlines than on keeping Americans safe.

While the administration pats itself on the back for shrinking Guantanamo’s population, Americans are left wondering: How many of these detainees will come back to haunt us?

Biden Bans Most Offshore Drilling in One of His Final Acts of ‘Political Revenge on the American People’

In a sweeping last-minute move, President Joe Biden issued a ban on most offshore drilling in U.S. waters, effectively halting new oil and gas leases in key areas like the Gulf of Mexico and parts of Alaska. The decision is expected to cripple American energy productionand further increase the country’s reliance on foreign oil imports.

Critics are calling the move “political revenge” on the energy sector, arguing it’s a deliberate attempt to sabotage the incoming Trump administration’s energy agenda. The ban marks a dramatic shift from Trump’s America First energy policy, which prioritized domestic production and energy independence.

The timing of Biden’s decision has raised concerns, with many seeing it as a parting shot to hinder the new administration’s first 100 days. It remains to be seen how Trump’s team will address the impact of this offshore drilling ban.

Trump: Biden ‘Doing Everything Possible’ to Make Transition Difficult

President-elect Donald Trump is accusing outgoing President Joe Biden of deliberately making the transition process difficult. Trump’s team claims that a flurry of last-minute executive orders from the Biden administration are designed to undermine key policy changes planned by the incoming administration.

Among the biggest obstacles? New energy regulations, immigration policies, and environmental rules that Trump’s team will now need to navigate or undo. Trump’s allies are calling these actions “deliberate sabotage”, arguing that Biden is leaving behind a regulatory minefield to slow down Trump’s first 100 days in office.

The transition process is typically a time of cooperation between outgoing and incoming administrations. However, the sheer volume of last-minute decisions from Biden’s team has created significant hurdles for Trump’s incoming administration.

Trump’s Best Option for Stopping Iran’s Nuclear Breakout

As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office, Iran’s nuclear ambitions have become a top foreign policy challenge. Intelligence reports indicate that Iran is closer than ever to a nuclear breakout, posing an immediate threat to regional and global security.

Trump’s advisers are considering a return to maximum pressure, which would include reinstating and expanding economic sanctions that were lifted during Biden’s presidency. The goal? Force Iran back to the negotiating table and slow its nuclear development.

While military options remain on the table, they are seen as a last resort. Trump’s team is focused on diplomatic solutions that can address the nuclear threat without escalating into full-scale conflict in the region.

1. Biden Scolds Reporters Saying He ‘Knows More World Leaders’ Than They Do in Their Whole ‘Goddamn’ Lives

During a heated exchange with reporters, President Joe Biden snapped back at questions about his foreign policy experience, claiming he “knows more world leaders” than they will ever meet in their “whole goddamn lives.” The outburst comes as Biden faces growing scrutiny over his handling of international relations. More on his remarks.

2. Harris Calls Role in Certifying Trump Win a ‘Sacred Obligation’

Vice President Kamala Harris defended her decision to certify Donald Trump’s election victory, calling it a “sacred obligation” under the Constitution. Harris’s comments come as progressive activists criticize her for not fighting harder to contest the results. Her remarks are seen as an attempt to distance herself from the more extreme factions of her party. See her statement.

3. Sunny Hostin Compares Jan. 6 Rioting to Slavery and the Holocaust in Unhinged Rant on ‘The View’

Sunny Hostin went on an unhinged rant during a recent episode of ‘The View,’ comparing the January 6 Capitol riot to slavery and the Holocaust. Her remarks sparked immediate backlash, with many calling the comparison inflammatory and offensive. Hostin defended her comments, arguing that the Capitol riot was an attack on democracy. Watch the clip.

4. Joe Biden Awards Presidential Medal of Freedom to Group Including George Soros, Hillary Clinton

President Joe Biden has awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to a controversial group of individuals, including George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and several Democratic donors. The move has drawn criticism from conservatives, who argue that the recipients are political allies rather than individuals representing true freedom. Details on the awards.

FEMA’s Expanding Role: What Aren’t They Telling Us?

In the wake of Hurricanes Helene and Milton, FEMA has been at the forefront, providing over $1.2 billion in aid to Florida alone. Their swift response is commendable, but it raises a critical question: Is disaster relief their only mission?

Established in 1979, FEMA’s mandate has evolved significantly. Beyond coordinating disaster response, the agency now possesses broad powers that can be activated during national emergencies. These include the authority to seize private property, restrict movement, and even detain citizens without trial.

Recent policy changes have further expanded FEMA’s reach. The Biden-Harris administration’s reforms aim to simplify disaster assistance, but they also grant the agency increased discretion in determining eligibility and distributing aid.

Moreover, FEMA’s budget has seen substantial growth. The latest government spending bill allocates over $29 billion to the agency, a significant increase intended to address the rising frequency and severity of natural disasters.

While these developments are framed as necessary adaptations to a changing climate, they also concentrate considerable power within a single federal agency. This centralization prompts concerns about transparency, oversight, and the potential for misuse of authority.

As FEMA’s role continues to expand, it’s imperative for citizens to stay informed and question how these changes might impact civil liberties. Understanding the full scope of FEMA’s authority is essential in ensuring that measures taken in the name of public safety do not encroach upon individual rights.

Stay tuned for an in-depth analysis in this Sunday’s edition of The Fed-Up Files - Subscribe

1. Congress has certified Donald Trump’s win in the 2024 presidential election despite the backdrop of a major winter storm affecting the capital.

2. Trump is set to be sentenced in a hush-money case on January 10th, creating a unique political situation where a president-elect faces legal consequences post-election.

3. Discussions are rife after conservative activist Scott Presler invited Democratic Senator John Fetterman to switch to the Republican Party, highlighting potential shifts within the Senate.

4. Mike Johnson has been re-elected as House Speaker in a narrow vote, showcasing the ongoing power struggles within the party.

5. In a significant policy move, President Joe Biden has commuted nearly all federal death row sentences, stirring debate on capital punishment before the transition.